Paul Eggert wrote: >Derek Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >>I chose the _SYS_CDEFS_H route since it seemed simplest to me, though I >>chose to name the macro `MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H'. >> >> > >Sorry, that's not right, since it fails in the following scenario: > > #define MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H 27 > #include <glob.h> > >in an ordinary program that is not using gnulib, but is using glibc. >MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H is part of the user's namespace, and should not affect >how <glob.h> works. > >Let's just use _SYS_CDEFS_H. We can then remove all mention of >MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H from glob_.h and undo the most recent change to >glob.m4. This should be OK: if we run into some non-glibc that has >this problem it will probably use some other include file anyway. > >
Fair enough, but why undo the change to glob.m4? Shouldn't I just change the target of the AC_DEFINE from MISSING_SYS_CDEFS_H to _SYS_CDEFS_H? Regards, Derek _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
