-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I for one am sad to see that CVS will probably soon lose what I would consider as one of its flagship users.
I wonder how long a tree tag will take if they are GPG-signed too... On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 08:51:32AM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote: > Kean Johnston wrote: > > >I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well > >written and got all the features one could want. But I > >don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to > >solve. cvs seems to be wroking really well for gcc. > > I could have said the complete opposite. For my GCC work, I can > practically hear CVS creaking. An hour and a half to tag a tree (blocking > all other committers during that time) is becoming unacceptable. > > >as stable and vital to teh community as gcc, changing something > >as fundamental as its SCM should come with a pretty big long > >set of justifictions (all coolness factors waived). There's > > This has been discussed over at least two GCC Summits (and possibly > longer). I don't think this switch is being done on a whim. > > Ben - -- A PC without Windows is like ice cream without ketchup. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/ Comment: My current key expires in two weeks, please ask for ID checks now. iD8DBQFDQlt4/FmLrNfLpjMRAhL+AJ9bcNprnzVTP0pMV4ENGBIWO2HtWgCeKhaw Ef/iCxbpTncCJPYeF4D+7wU= =Flol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
