-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Derek R. Price wrote: > Just to clarify, each user has 100 votes total, to be spread out as they > see fit between all the bugs. If you spend 10 votes voting for one bug > fix, you will only have 90 to vote for the next. I agree it would be > nice to be able to vote against an issue, but for now, the comment > fields will have to suffice. Thanks for the clarification (and thanks also to Sylvain). I can see a lot of sense in the way it's set up - it forces users to think about and prioritize the features they want. Otherwise, everyone would vote 100 for everthing ;=)
> At least, I don't feel it's necessary to disable Savannah voting - I > even like the voting system since it gives me another way to gauge what > some users are thinking. If others feel differently, please let me know. I agree that the voting system is useful, once you know how to use it ;=) I just wasn't exactly sure how it worked, that's all. - -- Jim Hyslop Dreampossible: Better software. Simply. http://www.dreampossible.ca Consulting * Mentoring * Training in C/C++ * OOD * SW Development & Practices * Version Management -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDw8XvLdDyDwyJw+MRAimuAJwIM75aRyNBnePK3917THDkYROCiACfU2xK Ht1H8kkIfGe8gJZF9ThGQQg= =FfAe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
