The programmer in me would like detail, so "1:30:00" would be my
preference. But I think that if this option is chosen, then it should be
in the format something like "0d:1h:30m:00s", so that there would be no
mistake when looking at a glance.
With that being said, the human in me would be fine with the current
format. Not really too concerned about seconds with run time, just
really want something that I can look at so I can see about how long it
has been running. Sometimes I might forget what day I started it and
could use a reminder :)
On 8/9/2013 1:08 PM, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote:
Scott Dwyer wrote:
I just ran a short test with the new logging options, and that could
be some useful info when wanted :)
Glad to know. :-)
Would it be possible to place the current total run time on the
screen with the rest of the current data, and update it as the data
on the screen is updated?
Sure. What format do you all think that is better for "run time" and
"time since last successful read", the current "1.5h" or "1:30:00"?
Best regards,
Antonio.
_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue
_______________________________________________
Bug-ddrescue mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-ddrescue
