This change was isolated automatically. Since none of we are familiar with the source code of diffutils, we debuged diffutils-2.8.1, diffutils-2.9, and diffutils-3.0 in a single step mode and compared related variables. We found that the the value of filevec[0].suffix_begin in 3.0 is not equal to that in 2.8.1. Owing to we do not know the specific meaning of filevec[0].suffix_begin, we suppose the value of it is right in 2.8.1.
Now we read your reply carefully, and think the value of filevec[0].suffix_begin is right in both 2.9 and 3.0, but wrong in 2.8.1. Moreover, the fix is right. Sorry for disturbing and thank you for your reply. 2010/10/8 Paul Eggert <[email protected]> > On 10/07/2010 04:03 AM, Kai YU wrote: > > OK. Since I found the letter in bug-diffutils is kind of messy, I > > rephrase our findings as below: > > Yes, something bad happened to your email before it > got published in < > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-diffutils/2010-10/msg00005.html>. > However, I think I understood it despite the encoding problems, and you can > read my reply at < > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-diffutils/2010-10/msg00007.html>. >
