On 10/15/10 07:39, Thomas Keller wrote: > My umask on some server creates no world-readable files, but this > should actually not be a problem when ACLs are in place which inherit > permissions from default rules for certain users and groups, right? > > I was quite astouned that patch(1) however ignored these default ACLs > when it created new files form a patch it received from STDIN. Is this > expected behaviour or considered a bug?
Sorry, I'm lost, and I expect almost any other reader of your email would be lost too, as there's not enough context. Can you please tell us a specific way to reproduce the bug?
