Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2011, Jim Meyering wrote: > >> Thanks, Eric. That works for me. >> I've just pushed this: >> >> >From 789252980fa8ef3d804372cd347898aa5c2ec7fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jim Meyering <[email protected]> >> Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:59:29 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH] doc: relax restriction on front-cover and back-cover texts >> [...] > > Thanks a lot!
It's worth mentioning in NEWS. Since I made a snapshot not long ago, I expect to make the 3.2 release in the next few days, depending on how things in gnulib look. >From 1747c6c7ebc02e2b3cb91e803f81681d99b6af71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jim Meyering <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:13:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] doc: mention that diffutils-doc may not be merged back into diffutils * NEWS (Packaging): Mention the "no front/back-cover" change. --- NEWS | 7 +++++++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS index 2ef515f..4d389f5 100644 --- a/NEWS +++ b/NEWS @@ -11,6 +11,13 @@ GNU diffutils NEWS -*- outline -*- diff and sdiff have a new option --ignore-trailing-space (-Z). +** Packaging + + The texinfo documentation no longer specifies "front-cover" or + "back-cover" texts, so that in Debian it may now be included in the + diffutils package, rather than in the separate diffutils-doc package. + + * Noteworthy changes in release 3.1 (2011-08-10) [stable] ** Bug fixes -- 1.7.7.rc0.362.g5a14
