On Sun, Jan 11, 2026, at 6:24 PM, Paul Eggert wrote: > "ed" doesn't do that. It treats directories just > like regular file Weren't directories readable in the old (e.g. version 6 or 7 Bell Labs Unix) days ... one could see the directory entries with their binary encoded inode numbers and directory entry names using plain open(2) and read(2) system calls, right? The nice directory entry library routines, then kernel interface changes to better distinguish the special role that directory files and that abstracted directory entries across various file systems came as an after thought ... right? Paul Jackson [email protected]
- Fwd: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Andrew L. Moore
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Alexander Jones
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Paul Eggert
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Douglas McIlroy
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ... Alexander Jones
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic ... Paul Eggert
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic ... Andrew L. Moore
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Andrew L. Moore
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ... jackson
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ... Paul Eggert
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic ... jackson
- Re: bug#80158: incorrect diagnos... Paul Eggert
- Re: Fwd: bug#80158: incorrect diagnostic from ed Paul Eggert
