So its impractical to share binaries for 2.6 and 2.7 64 bit?
Or if I build it on 2.7, it will also run on 2.6?
marty
>
> I suggest you build new binaries for the 64-bit 2.7 system.
>
> There are some bugs in fileutils-4.0.
> I suggest you use the latest test release instead:
>
> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/fetish/fileutils-4.0x.tar.gz
>
> martin leisner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I got and made fileutils 4.0 (on a 32 bit solaris 2.6 machine).
> |
> | When I ran it on a 64 bit 2.7 machine, it wants to break on big files...
> |
> | 1 :mleisner@dariat; ls
> | ls: iozone.tmp: Value too large for defined data type
> | 1 :mleisner@dariat; /bin/ls
> | iozone.tmp
> | 1 :mleisner@dariat; /bin/ls -l
> | total 8392720
> | -rw-r----- 1 mleisner mv-eng4 4294967296 Jul 24 17:40 iozone.tmp
> | 1 :mleisner@dariat; rm iozone.tmp
> | rm: cannot remove `iozone.tmp': Value too large for defined data type
> | 1 :mleisner@dariat; /bin/rm iozone.tmp
> |
> |
> | I didn't see anything which talked about these differences (and I'm
> | ignorant as to what works and doesn't work on 32/64 bit machines)
> |
> |
> | Marty Leisner
> | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marty Leisner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
