Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:18:37 +0100 (BST)
>> From: Edward Avis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> What does POSIX say about 'rm -r FOO' and 'rm -r FOO/'?
>
> If FOO is a symbolic link to a directory, then POSIX 1003.1-200x d7
> says 'rm -r FOO' removes only the link FOO, and 'rm -r FOO/' removes
> only the directory FOO/ (and all files underneath it). This relies on
> the fact that rmdir("FOO/") removes the directory FOO/ (assuming it is
> empty).
>
>> If DOUGAL is a directory, then 'rm -r DOUGAL', 'rm -r DOUGAL/', 'rm
>> -r DOUGAL//' and so on should all work.
>
> That's right.
Doesn't POSIX require `rm -r dir/'
to be treated just like `rm -r dir/.' ?
The latter gets an error with GNU rm:
$ rm -r dir/.
rm: cannot remove `.' or `..'
[Exit 1]
_______________________________________________
Bug-fileutils mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
