Bernd Jendrissek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-28 18:54:37 +0200]: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:12:08PM +0200, David T-G wrote: > > That's great, and thanks for the contribution, but ... um, what does > > this have to do with fileutils? You probably should send this to the > > Nothing whatsoever, other than that I thought coreutils had gulped up > fileutils too.
I think David was commenting that you sent the report to the "wrong" address. Perhaps he was just too subtle? :-) You sent your mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and not to [EMAIL PROTECTED] as you had probably intended since su was part of sh-utils and therefore would normally have the reporting address of bug-sh-utils and not bug-fileutils. Those are still independent lists (for a very short time yet) and have unique subscribers to each list. Of course all three have been bundled into coreutils and so point is moot into the future. > Besides, it's fixed in 4.5.3 anyway. Sorry for bothering the list(s) :) Those are the best types, where things are already fixed. Bob _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
