Hi
> You wanted it included, not me. I'm just telling you what you should > do to make Jim happy. =) I don't WANT it to be included. It was a suggestion, nothing more, nothing less. > Some more nitpicks, I don't think this option deserves an short > option. EOT. > And maybe you could make the long option take an argument? I.e. > something like --broader-size=12, this way you won't hit a "limit", and > you give the user freedom to pick her own preference. Also, the option > name sucks, it should be something more descriptive, maybe --size-width? Let's wait until someone implements. --output-format='%f %s[..]' (See "find" for all the options that should be there) Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. _______________________________________________ Bug-fileutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-fileutils
