On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:22:13AM +0000, anonymous wrote: > > Follow-up Comment #2, bugs #12235 (project findutils): > > Looks like problem comes due to old versions of findutils on the > only linuxes I have for testing (RH9, latest official findutils > packages). Sorry for the bug report sounding rude, I was heavily > annoyed while porting software from linux, and because I did not see > any answer to the cited thread in bug-findutils, making me believe > the options are still not available.
Of course, nobody is paying us volunteers to maintain findutils. Perhaps a more appropriate target for your irritation is whoever you paid for what you presumably had originally thought was a POSIX-compliant system. More tools would be POSIX-compliant if POSIX-compliance test suites were freely available. Unfortunately, I don't know of any free ones. POSIX ocmpliance suites require a great deal of effort to build, prove, and maintain. Understandably organisations willing to put in that amount of effort tend to want to recoup their investment. Regards, James. _______________________________________________ Bug-findutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils
