On 6/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason for this is that find may or may not change CWD as it goes,
> depending on which binary you are running and how it is configured
> (e.g. the value of ftsoptions in ftsfind.c, the availability of
> /proc/N/fd, and whether you are running the "find" or "oldfind"
> binary).
Yuck. But ignoring ENOENT is not the right way to handle this, is it?
Ignoring ENOENT relates to the readdir() race condition, not to the CWD.
James.
_______________________________________________
Bug-findutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-findutils
