I am terribly sorry. I goofed in the following message, which is also here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gdb/2001-01/msg00029.html I was using the wrong test procedure. The fact is that the original bug reported here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gdb/2000-12/msg00064.html is SOLVED, even without applying the patch proposed here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gdb/2000-12/msg00073.html My condolences. ----- Forwarded message from Pierre Sarrazin ----- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:23:58 -0500 About the bug I reported here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gdb/2000-12/msg00064.html I downloaded the CVS sources today and if I add the patch proposed here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-gdb/2000-12/msg00073.html my original bug is solved. When using the current CVS revision (1.25) of src/gdb/symtab.c, the bug remains. -- Pierre Sarrazin <sarrazip at machinasapiens dot com> ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Bug-gdb mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb
