Hi,
I also think it's worth tracking down. Don't have a lot of time, though...
Any clues where/how to start looking?!
Bart
Kevin Buettner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@gnu.org on 12/07/2001 09:05:44 PM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: The thread/float/NaN bug in GDB 5.1, a survey
On Dec 7, 3:22pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But when I recompiled GDB with the default optimilisation level -O2
> and ran it on another "production" machine (vanilla Mandrake 8.1,
> PentiumII), I got NaNs again! Same GDB on a identically configured
> Mandrake 8.1 (PentiumIII), no problem... It is CPU related. But how?!
Bart,
If you have the time, I think it'd be worth tracking this problem
down...
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Bug-gdb mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb
_______________________________________________
Bug-gdb mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gdb
