> Of course, gtags should sort parser's output by the default, > When user teaches that parser's output is unsorted, execution of > gnusort can be skipped.
How does efficiency improve? > Execution of sort command is not omissible only by this change. > By the way, I have already added -u option to gtags.conf. I don't think that you should do all at a time. How about separating a general implementation and a special case (--sort=xxx option of Exuberant Ctags)? After doing a general implementation, could you insist on the merit of new config variable for the special case? > Why? The unsorted parser's output is desirable for us. Unsorting means nothing is guaranteed about the order, right? -- Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tama Communications Corporation PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3 _______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
