Hi,
> I patched the gtags-parser/Cpp so that it does not record forward
> definitions of classes (e.g. "class myClass;"), because in bigger projects
> forward definitions may be used very extensively to reduce compile times,
> and gtags would report a lot "false-positive" matches.
>
> I have not come across a disadvantage of this. Perhaps it could be
> interesting for forward definitions of functions as well.
Thank you for your suggestion.
I agree with you.
By the way, GLOBAL has three tag files:
'GTAGS'
Tag file for object definitions.
'GRTAGS'
Tag file for object references.
'GSYMS'
Tag file for other symbols.
I would like to move forward definitions of classes from GTAGS to GSYMS.
What do you think?
Are there any problem?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________
Bug-global mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
