Thank you very much for considering my comment.
Well, the e-mail sent from Chris, includes the file so that peekc() can
ignore
the comment.
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-global/2008-02/msg00003.html>
Why don't you use it?
Regards,
On Nov 11, 2008 3:00pm, Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Hirohito Kato wrote:
> I think that a 'peekc(int)' function, defined in libutil/token.c, should
> ignore the comment part of codes.
> Because, my patch doesn't work well under the following code:
>
> >>>
> extern /* comment */ "C" ...
>
>
> The reason why it doesn't do is peekc(0) returns '/'.
> If the peekc() ignores the comment block, not only my patch but also
>
> "Re: gtags missing functions with comments before their parameters"
> --- On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:13:17
>
> problem will be fixed.
>
> I know the current most important task is rewriting parser by flex,
> but I hope you will apply patches for peekc() and extern "C/C++" issue
> for othe global user.
>
> I would like to know your opinion.
I agree with you.
Could you please send me the patch?
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________
Bug-global mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
