> How about adding --args-file option instead of the -F command? OK. This is revised edition.
global/global.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- global/manual.in | 5 +++ gtags.conf.in | 2 + htags/anchor.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- htags/anchor.h | 3 + htags/htags.c | 16 +--------- 6 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:31:33 +0900, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote... > Hello again, > > -f, --file files > > Print all tags in the files. > > This option implies the -x option. > > -F, --file-list file > > Read from file a list of file names and print all tags > > in each file in the list. > > If file is -, read from standard input. > > File names must be separated by newline. > > This option implies the -x option. > > How about adding --args-file option instead of the -F command? > > Commands: > -f, --file files > Print all tags in the files. > This option implies the -x option. > If the --args-file options is specified, [files] on the command line > is ignored. > > Options: > --args-file file > Read from file a list of arguments. > If file is -, read from standard input. > Arguments must be separated by newline. > This option can be used only with the -f(--file-list) command now. > > > I don't think that a usual user uses the -F command. So, it is not necessary > to offer it as a command. The --args-file=file option can be used with other > commands in the future. > > What do you think? > -- > Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]> > PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3 ---- Hideki IWAMOTO [email protected]
20091118-global-args-file.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
