Jean-Marc Saffroy said:
> Unfortunately there is still a lot of old K&R code lying around. To me, it
> would be a pity if global dropped support for K&R.
Ezolt, Phillip said:
> Ouch. Yeah... we don't want to do that. I think we need k&r support.
OK. I won't stop the support of K&R.
> Ok.. Ok. How about THIS rule.. (if this even possible?)
>
> If we see a semicolon, AND then we see an open paren BEFORE we see an open b=
> race, we know the token before the paren is a function and the previous func=
> tion is complete?
>
> That would catch this:
> A() bob;
> int foo() <=3D=3D=3D=3D this paren means the previous symbol is complete
> {
> }
> ...
> But not k and r:
> A(bar)
> int bar;
> {
> }
It seems not to be able to handle the following K&R example:
int sort(v, n, cmp)
char *v[];
int n;
int (*cmp)();
{
...
}
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]>
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
_______________________________________________
Bug-global mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
