Hello, On 06/29/16 02:28, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote: > I change my opinion. I'd like to leave this problem for porters. > We cannot say a certain thing about platforms which don't have PATH_MAX. > Those who want to port GLOBAL to such platforms should set PATH_MAX to > an appropriate value. > I would like to add code as follows: > > #ifndef PATH_MAX > Since this platform does not have PATH_MAX, you should define it > using an appropriate value for the platform. > /* #define PATH_MAX 1024 */ > #endif > > What do you think? >
I see your point and I am okay with this approach. Thank you, Manolis
diff --git a/libutil/find.h b/libutil/find.h index 45e3603..519a1ba 100644 --- a/libutil/find.h +++ b/libutil/find.h @@ -21,6 +21,12 @@ #ifndef _FIND_H_ #define _FIND_H_ +#ifndef PATH_MAX +/* Since this platform does not have PATH_MAX, you should define it + using an appropriate value for the platform. */ +/* #define PATH_MAX 1024 */ +#endif + void set_accept_dotfiles(void); void set_skip_unreadable(void); int skipthisfile(const char *);
_______________________________________________ Bug-global mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-global
