On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Hans D. Mittelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Basically you were confusing "a constraint that evaluates to 0<=0" > with one that explicity is "0<=0". The first may happen the > latter should not. > Hans Mittelmann
Yes, you are right, I was mistaken when submitting this report. FYI my post here is actually related to a bug in another piece of software [1], where this time a problem occurs when a constraint actually evaluates to "0 <= 0" and is not explicitly "0 <= 0". That is why the confusing title. Sorry. [1] http://code.google.com/p/pulp-or/issues/detail?id=31 _______________________________________________ Bug-glpk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-glpk
