I’m quite happy to fix it along the lines I suggested, it’s only a small, low impact change?
Thanks, Mike > On 31 Aug 2024, at 10:24, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ping! Should I close this? > >> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 11:43:51 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> >> >>> From: Po Lu <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected], [email protected] >>> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 16:24:28 +0800 >>> >>> Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> Ping! >>>> >>>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>>> Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 10:54:54 +0300 >>>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> Po Lu, how can we make some progress here? >>>>> >>>>>> From: Mike Woolley <[email protected]> >>>>>> Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2024 11:10:15 +0100 >>>>>> Cc: Po Lu <[email protected]>, >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry Eli, >>>>>> >>>>>> I had replied, but forgot to CC the list :-) >>> >>> I suspect that if you make this mistake and correct it afterwards the >>> entire thread will be classified as spam... >>> >>>>>> What I was saying was: of course I can remove the bindings from the map >>>>>> myself (& indeed that’s what I've >>>>>> done), but my point is why should I have to? >>>>>> Why is a feature that’s turned off still having an effect? I think this >>>>>> is unnecessary and surprising to users (at >>>>>> least it was to me)! >>>>>> >>>>>> I was thinking this paging animation feature might be better as it’s own >>>>>> minor mode, which would do the right >>>>>> thing with keymaps and is how the other features in the same file are >>>>>> implemented? >>> >>> Yes, but that ship sailed with the release of Emacs 29. It's too late >>> to change any of these mechanics. >> >> So should we close this bug as wontfix, then? >> >> >> >>
