On Thursday 23 June 2005 02:00 pm, Joseph Heled wrote: > Yes, gnubg can't learn from it's own rollouts in this case. It > can't learn from humans since you need tens of thousands of > examples to train a reasonable "bootstrap" NN. So the challenge is > - find a simple enough strategy (simple enough == can be coded > without an NN) that will play better than gnubg in those > situations. If you think it is easy go ahead - I tried and found it > is not so easy. when we have that we can make some progress.
Does this algorithm need to actually make plays, or is it sufficient to provide relative values of positions? -- Rod _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
