I would still love an option to have all on the same line. If you cut on the spaces for move number, abbriviate the ply, and use W+G-OG (i.e 62.7+28.1-14.7 for wins wins gammons lose gammons), it should fit nicely in one line.
What do you think? -Joseph On 8/31/05, Jonathan Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >From: Jim Segrave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >To: Jon Kinsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >CC: [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Maximum move string > >Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 10:01:03 +0200 > > > >On Wed 31 Aug 2005 (07:25 +0100), Jon Kinsey wrote: > > > Jim Segrave wrote: > > > > > > > > One question - when you unclick Details to suppress the w/g/bg stats, > > > > they are replaced by a blank line. Is there any way to make the > > > > display single line so that you get twice as many moves listed when > > > > you don't want the details? > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure what you mean here's a screen shot with/without details and > > > it does show about twice as many moves in singe lines: > > > > > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jon_kinsey/bg/list5.png > > > http://homepage.ntlworld.com/jon_kinsey/bg/list6.png > > > >Here's a capture of this window with and without details. With > >details, there are 5 moves showing and 11 lines of text. Turning off > >details, there are 8 moves showing. There should be 11, maybe 12, as > >there are no spacer lines. > > This is as expected. There are 2 reasons, firstly the no-details view has a > header, secondly the detail view has 2 text lines quite close to each other > (or to put it another way it has one seperator per 2 lines). I don't think > the number of moves displayed has decreased compared to older versions? > > One idea is to use the new control for both views, then the move would be > bold for both. I'm not sure it's too important. I like the simple/detailed > views. > > Jon > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
