Øystein Johansen wrote: > >>>3. Are the problems I'm seeing due to faults in the texi file, xml file >>>or gnubg processing? (There are lots of errors when the manual is shown) > > > Are you talking about the manual content or what it looks at in the > displayed window? The manual window is really not cute. It has been > reported by Joseph many many years ago, but I don't think anyone cares.
It doesn't really work... All the text is a bit garbled, lots of xml parsing errors (there's also not much content...). > > I reather think we should concentrate on the manual wiki on the webpage. > We can maybe find a way to generate a texi file based on the wiki content. That sounds like a good idea - the content seems much better on the website. What format is it stored in and can we extract it to xml somehow? Jon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
