On Wed 17 May 2006 (17:31 -0700), David Levy wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Christian Anthon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 9:06 AM > To: David Levy > Cc: [email protected] > > >Jørn Thyssen who implemented the python interface is currently inactive and > as nobody > >else amongst the developers seem too interested in the further development > my > >guess is no, not unless you are able to contribute yourself ;). > > Alas, this is beyond my present skills. > > Does the lack of interest suggest that python support within gnubg is what > we used > to call "an evolutionary dead end?"
No, it's just that some of us have simply been too strapped for time, between a young child, moving house and some huge changes at work, gnubg development has taken a back seat for me. I did make some small changes earlier to the python interface an, from looking at the code that's there, I can see that it's very flexible in terms of what can be added. It seems much easier to work with than the old embedded interface that it replaced. -- Jim Segrave [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
