Christian Anthon wrote:
> Likely okay, though in the first of MaX's windows build there was
> problems with i18n support and I had problems loading the net.

Maybe we should only provide binary weights in the build?

> I checked in a few clean-ups and updated the auto-tools stuff.

Looks fine....

> Concerning the training:What is left in the current code seems rather
> amputated to me. Am I correct to asume that all the training made in
> the recent years were done entirely with external tools or does the
> training interact with the gnubg code?

It's so many years ago that the training things was done internaly in
gnubg that not even I can remember. Joseph is the man with the training,
and he has always used his own little tools. Any training code gnubg can
be removed in my opinion.

CommandTrainTD and so on and the variables setting the training and
creating new nets etc.... Just get rid of it!

-Øystein

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to