Jonathan Kinsey wrote: > There's a few source files that produce tools or test utilities in the > gnubg root directory, it would be better if these were somewhere else (a > util or utility sub directory maybe). > > A quick look turns up these files (which don't get built into gnubg.exe): > bearoffdump.c > erftest.c > > makebearoff.c > makebearoff1.c > makehyper.c > makeweights.c > > lib/hashtest.c > lib/md5test.c > > I guess the changes would mainly be to the autotools build files, > perhaps Christian would like to take a look when you're stuck for things > to do...
I suggest: erftest.c hashtest.c and md5test.c (and maybe bearoffdump.c) removed totally. makebearoff1.c makebearoff.c makehyper.c makeweights.c can be moved to a 'tool' directory. > I know the whole tree could do with a re-structure but sometimes small > steps are the way forward. Yes, long term plan.... This has been discussed some years ago as well. Dmitri even posted a suggested directory structure. I'm not sure if there is a GNU standard/recommended structure. I beleve I found such once, but don't remember where of course. Important. (at least a bit important). Do _not_ remove the files in root directory and add them in a subdirectory. That won't preserve the history. Decide what to move and lat one of the savannah hackers do the job. They have shell access. -Øystein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
