David Levy Sent: 25 July 2006 17:13 > > I don't see any way to get a consistently meaningful evaluation of > > induced errors. Judging intent is best left to humans. > > One way to handle the "deliberate" error is to have an option > where the user could tell gnubg to ignore a particular error > in calculating an overall match result. No inference by > gnubg, but an extra field in the data structure (and an extra > gui control). > > The same approach could have helped me ignore the .68 > "mis-click" error I made in a recent online match -- where I > moved the checkers in the wrong order leaving three blots in > my board instead of closing it!
You can go a particular move and clear the analysis of that move. This updates the stats. This has most of the desired effect, but it's not automatic (sorry, Albert ;) -- Ian _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list Bug-gnubg@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
