as if its positional analysis were known to be completely correct. from
the point of view of contactless bearoff.
A tip f the hat towards gnubg;s developers.
But also: Not quite te correct way to proceed.
Proof of otimality of positions is very difficult to attain.
Something to keep in mind.
On 9/18/06,
Robert-Jan Veldhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi team,
GNUBG already has nice panels with various race formulas, I think the Keith Count deserves a place there. It is both quite simple to learn and use and mostly more accurate than the Thorp and Kleinman counts. It doesn't give GWC directly but that may be solvable just as there is Bower's interpolation for the Thorp count.
Here's a link to the summary of the Keith Count, lots of other info are on the rest of the same page:
http://www.bkgm.com/articles/CubeHandlingInRaces/#summary_of_the_keith_count
Cheers,
--Robert-Jan Veldhuizen
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
--
--
Roy A. Crabtree
UNC '76 gaa.lifer#11086
Room 207 Studio Plus
123 East McCullough Drive
Charlotte, NC 28262-3306
336-340-1304 (office/home/cell/vmail)
704-510-0108x7404 (voicemail residence)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.authorsden.com/royacrabtree
http://skyscraper.fortunecity.com/activex/720/resume/full.doc
--
(c) RAC/IP, ARE,PRO,PAST
(Copyright) Roy Andrew Crabtree/In Perpetuity
All Rights/Reserved Explicitly
Public Reuse Only
Profits Always Safe Traded
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
