>The problem with load/save problems of sgf files should also be fixed, >but more testing would be prudent. Perhaps it is about time we make a >stable/unstable fork of gnubg and be critical about which patches to >backport to the stable edition.
I'm defintely in favour of this. I do think it's high time for a stable version : current gnubg is mature enough to deserve a version number better than 0.14 ... Also, part of the effort could be redirected to fixing existing bugs (bugtracker seems to have a long list). MaX. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
