Perhaps. However I can see GNUbg coming to life without Linux. I can't see it happening without GNU. Think gcc, emacs, python, gtk and so on. I think Stallman deserves the credit and we owe it to him, especially if he cares about it.
On 6/5/07, Christian Anthon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL, I seriously wonder when RMS stopped having fun. He may be right and perhaps even justified, but stuff like this just alienates people who support the GNU idea. Christian. On 6/4/07, Achim Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > > Thou shalt not speak of "Linux" > Thou shalt not speak of "Win" > Those names art just like eunuchs > And nothing but a sin. > > Thou shalt always mention "GNU" > Thou shalt ever honour "GPL" > Thine web page hath to change soon > Else rot will thou in hell > And perils of my curses > Will fall upon all you. > > So hath spoken His Honourable Excellency, Richard Stallman. > > After some e-mail exchanges I made a few corrections on the web > page. To all the developers and documentation writers: Please use > "Windows", "MS Windows" and "GNU/Linux" in future ;-). > > Ciao > > Achim > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
