Michael Petch wrote:
Technically cybersquatting is illegal when it Is done so to generaterevenue.
I'm no expert but I think cybersquatting only applies in certain cases. I can't see how we've got more right than anyone to gnubg.com really. There's thousand of mis-type like sites too, I just tried at random: http://www.googl.com/, if google can't stop this I think netgammon have little chance either.
In reality people go to a search engine and type gnubg or gnu backgammon and get the correct site as the first result. Not that I'm against anyone contacting them and seeing what they say.
Jon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
