If you present substantial data which proves your assertion maybe someone can have a look. Substantial here means several thousand random positions. How you judge which one is "overestimating" and which one is not is up to you. I can't think of anything else but a rollout, which has it's own problems but should play better than a 2-3 ply in general.
-Joseph On Feb 8, 2008 10:32 AM, rambiz khalili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all, > i would like to know why gnu 2-ply overestimates the equity of a certain > move or position in comparison with gnu 3-ply? to me it seems like a > SYSTEMATIC bug in the evaluation function! > many people i have spoken to say that gnu 2-ply is more reliable than gnu > 3-ply! is it true? > thx for considering my question > regards > rambiz > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
