I believe it is correct, but I'll be happy to point you to the
relevant places in the code if you wish to have a look yourself.
Remember that the variance on the expected number of points won may be
huge on a few games.

I'll change the way it is printed as per your suggestion.

Christian.

On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, bob koca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>     I think it is now giving the CI for the total number of points in the
> session rather than points per game (as it is labeled).
> Also there may be confusion with the - indicating both a dash separating the
> two numbers and also a negative symbol.
> Brackets with a comma is often used for confidence interval.  For example
> instead of  -.43 - -.21 consider  [-.43, -.21]
>
> Bob Koca
>
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 01:11:05 +0200
>> From: "Christian Anthon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] How confidence intervals are displayed
>> To: "bob koca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Message-ID:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Hi Bob,
>>
>> no it was the average and the upper that was displayed. Fixed now.
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 7:51 PM, bob koca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > When clicking on "match/session statistics" there are two rows given
>> > with
>> > heading "95% confidence interval (ppg)" separated by
>> >
>> > a row with heading " Advantage (luck adjusted) in ppg" A single value is
>> > given in each row for each player. A CI is not a single value though.
>> >
>> > I am supposing that one row gives the upper value of the interval and
>> > the
>> > other the lower value, but better would be to have something like
>> >
>> > 95% confidence interal (ppg) 0.23 - 1.12
>> >
>
>
> ________________________________
> Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. IM on
> your terms.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>
>


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Reply via email to