I am not exactly sure which timestamp I used. It was the one that would
have been there about 7 or 8 days ago. After
seeing these results I went back and downloaded an older version. I reupped the
current one (20090204 as you used)
and now get the same results as you.
Bob Koca
> > > Message: 8> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:47:15 +0100> From: Massimiliano
> > > Maini <[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] cubeless
> > > ok but not cubeful.> To: [email protected]> Cc:
> > > [email protected],>
> > > [email protected]> Message-ID:>
> > > <of26daf810.e14f9a30-onc1257555.00568035-c1257555.0056b...@amadeus.com>>
> > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"> > Hi Bob,> > what's the
> > > timestamp of the gnubg version you're using ?> > With the latest one
> > > (20090204) I don't see the problem and I know that I > have shipped 1 or
> > > 2 version with a major bug in.> > I get:> * My example with the wierd
> > > resuls and his results cut*
_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect.
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t2_allup_howitworks_022009_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
