[email protected] wrote on
26/03/2009 15:21:00:
> Hi all,
>
> I believe that the current version is what I would like to call 1.0.
> Probably the cmark and hint features still need a bit of polishing,
> but besides that I'm committed to not adding more features and making
> adjustments that aren't totally necessary. That is, unless something
> comes up in reply to this mail and I guess that Jon will have a few
> things that he would like to do. Otherwise, it is bug fixing,
> documentation ?!, and translations until we hit 1.0.
I do agree we should have a stable branch for version 1.0beta.
I still hear many players using old gnubg version arguing that the new
ones are
not stable enough. It's hard to make them understand that the old ones,
despite
being stable, are also buggy.
Another thing we should do is stop having the version number
hardcoded in config.h (which is not a source file, it is somehow
generated).
Would it be possible to have in a source file (backgammon.h) ?
MaX.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
