I'm definitely for removing the non-threaded code. Personally I would just have
threaded code - are there any systems which don't support threads?
Ideally someone could run some tests on a single core machine to see how much
slower the threaded code is (with one thread) compared to the single-threaded
code. My guess is a couple of percent, but that is a guess.
Jon
Christian Anthon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm considering to remove the non-threaded code. The threaded code
> should be able to run without threads with minor adjustments (replacing
> thread-safe operations with equivalent unsafe ones or NULL operations as
> appropriate), and we wouldn't have two sets of code to keep working at
> the same time. There may still be a small time-penalty involved. Anybody
> with a strong opinion against this?
>
> Christian.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
_________________________________________________________________
View your Twitter and Flickr updates from one place – Learn more!
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/137984870/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
