Purely a technical reason. I tried to do it a long while ago and it didn't work as I expected. I'll put it on the todo now that I know that part of the code again.
Christian. On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Michael Petch<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I know the Previous/Next marked decision buttons (and next roll and previous > roll) have been around forever, and they haven't changed all that much. > > Early on, someone made a decision to not allow the "Previous/Next marked > decisions" buttons to go beyond game boundaries. I was using the new CMARK > features (finally) and felt it was a nuisance to click "move back to > previous game" (or next game) to continue reviewing rolls. > > I wonder how many would object if we changed those buttons to go to a > previous (or next game) when the end/beginning of the current game Is > reached. I know we are moving towards 1.0, and I personally think its a > small usability thing that one might consider, but I am sure there is a good > reason why we do it the current way thus this email. > > The same holds true for the back/next roll buttons. > > Michael > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
