The sigmoid calculation being more accurate (may the word I should use is ³more preciise²) was a side effect of the new SSE2 performance enhancement. It has been discussed previously on the mailing list. The variations I have seen have been very small (maybe at most 0.1-0.2% MWC change when observing TOTAL errors of a match as expressed in MWC).
Oystein and Christian, any feelings on this? Is it significant enough that the net would have to be retrained? Michael On 31/08/09 3:07 PM, "Joseph Heled" <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not sure if you are missing the point or me. Being "more accurate" may be > nice but unless the training is repeated it is probably harmfull.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
