On 01/09/09 5:22 PM, "Michael Petch" <[email protected]> wrote: > I haven¹t provided the output, but I ran 0,1,2,3 plies (Same filter and other > settings). In those instances Cache Evals = No Cached evals, which leads me to > believe we still have an issue with plies >3 with caching that hasn¹t been > discovered. I will look at the code more tonight and if I see anything I¹ll > let people know. My guess is we have missed something small somewhere (I > hope). It appears we may be dealing with an optimization issue. Stay tuned.
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
