Also, ni the CLI I have this: (No game) help next next - Step ahead within the game
Usage: next [game|roll|rolled|marked] <count> "within the game" doesn't sound convncing for a "next game" :) Also, what the hell is "next rolled" ? MaX. 2009/9/24 Massimiliano Maini <[email protected]>: > Right. Logicallly it should be Mark (or Flag or tag) for what today is > CMark, and Error for what today is Mark... > > 2009/9/24 Ian Shaw <[email protected]>: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] >>> On Behalf Of Massimiliano Maini >>> Sent: 24 September 2009 11:08 >>> To: Christian Anthon >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Few recent issues (20090922 code) >>> >>> We can keep the commands in the CL interface as they are, but >>> we can still change the labels in the menus and toolbar. >>> >>> I'm for changing the commands in the CLI too, or at least to >>> define aliases like next roll = next move, so that backward >>> compatibility is kept and clearer commands are available too >>> (in sync with GUI). >>> >>> Also, I really dislike not having the buttons for prev marked >>> and prev cmarked. if the issue is space, we canmake things >>> smaller or eventually remove the buttons for prev/next game, >>> since we have the drop down list anyway. >>> >> >> If you're changing labels, perhaps you should think about the Cmark >> itself. >> >> I've worked out what it does, obviously, but I've no idea what "Cmark" >> actually means, so not will many others. >> >> How about just "Mark", "Tag" or "Flag"? >> >> -- Ian >> > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
