On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Jonathan Kinsey <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm planning to remove the calibrate option, largely due to the bad > multithreaded results and general "badness" of this function. > > Maybe someone with some Python skills can try and write a script that does a > similar job, on the lines of > 1. Set up some standard settings (eval+random number for example) > 2. Rollout out or analyse one or more sample positions > 3. Report on the speed of the machine > It might be difficult to get the test to run for a reasonable amount of time > (given the range of cpus/number of threads), ideally it would take about > 30-60 > seconds I would think. >
I'll do it when I find the time. As for the time issue people will be prepared for it to take longer if they have a slow machine. We could also make a quick/long option for the test. Christian. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
