I'm not a Mac user myself, so I do not know. I'm forwarding this to the mailing list. (I guess you forgot to add a cc.)
-Øystein 2010/4/5 Julian Wilson <[email protected]> > hello > > Can anyone help me with what I suspect is a stupid question. > > I'm a new GNU user and use a MAC. > > I cannot seem to set up a position. My windows friends say that this is > because I do not have a right click mouse.... > > I'm sure there must be a workround/alternative for mac. > > Thanks in anticipation. > > > On 3 Apr 2010, at 20:03, Øystein Johansen wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for your effort. The difference in strength between 0-ply and 2-ply > is significant, but not so much stronger that it is possible to make a clear > statement after 10 games. I suggests you play 100.000 games and then report > the result. > > I've done such experiments my self, and I can assure you that 2-ply is > stronger than 0-ply. You can take my word for it, or you can extend your > experiment. :-) > > Thanks anyway! > -Øystein > > > On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:50 PM, tocy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> i made an experiment and let the computer play against computer with gnubg >> program, one side played with "ply-0" level and one side played with >> "ply-2" >> level, >> guess who kept win again and again about 10 times or more?the side who >> played with level "ply-0", >> how is that possible? >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/computer-vs.-computer-tp28128791p28128791.html >> Sent from the Gnu - Backgammon mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bug-gnubg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >> > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > > >
_______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
