Hi. If it is 4pt limited $ session, it is very bad idea to "emulate " it with 4away-4away match. Especially "redouble to 4" In match game we know, we need 40% to take. In limetd money game, we need only 25%
So, redouble to 8 in 8pt limited money session must be ill evaluated in 8pt match. Nori 2010/6/27 Jonathan Kinsey <[email protected]>: > There isn't an option to set limits in cash games in gnubg. I suppose > setting > it up as the first game in a 8 point match (in your example) would give a > closer > analysis, I imagine there are some subtle differences though. > > Jon > > On 27/06/2010 08:04, Julian Wilson wrote: >> hello all. >> >> when playing money games online the players usually 'limit' their losses >> by setting a stake per point but with a maximum loss (e.g. £10 per point £80 >> maximum loss). Assuming these parameters and the cube is at 4 or 8, then I'm >> concerned that the cube decision analysis is wrong. My concern is that as >> the game is limited and the cube (say) at 8 (in the example given) then no >> player can win a double or treble game and more importantly the redouble >> option is also of no value. >> >> Is this a real limitation of the cube decision analysis? And if yes then >> are there any settings options (in GNU) to accurately model cube decisions >> in limited loss cash games? >> >> Thanks in anticipation. >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bug-gnubg mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg >> >> > > > > > ________________________________ > Get a free e-mail account with Hotmail. Sign-up now. > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
