On Wed 24 Nov 2010 (16:42 -0000), [email protected] wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Many thanks for your comprehensive and helpful reply. > > I will try to run your scripts tomorrow when I'm a bit fresher. > I don't personally know any Python programmers so I'm not sure if it will go > much further than that. > > Also I tried to check the link at > > www.xs4all.nl/~jes-2
www.xs4all.nl/jes2 (my mistake, my account was jes-2.demon.nl, when xsrall bought demon my account was migrated and the '-' was accidently dropped > but it is giving a 404 error at the moment? > > Finally, you did ask a couple of clarification questions which I will answer > here: > > >>> + number of occasions successfully hit a single blot when within > >>> 1 dice roll range (when you actually want to hit it i.e. not leaving > >>> something silly open for your opponent to get of the bar and return a > >>> hit. I know this bit sounds difficult to calculate) / vs gnubg's stats > > >>You'd need to define what you actually mean a lot better. I don't know > >>what you eman by gnubg's stats > By 'vs gnubg's stats' I meant posing the same query again, but not for the > human - for the computer. (For comparison) Further clarification wouldl be needed. How can a program decide when a hit would be silly? I think defining when a hit is advisable or not is quite complex. You'd need to look at gnubg's evaluation of hitting vs not hitting, bbut that evaluation won't be available if you didn't get a roll where a hit was possible. -- Jim Segrave [email protected] _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
