Hi, On 04/20/2011 06:36 PM, Philippe Michel wrote: > On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Guido Flohr wrote: >> Say, the first three rolls are 66, 22, 31. I could do it like this: >> >> ( >> ;GM[6] >> ;DI[66]CV[2] >> ;DI[22]CV[4] >> ;DI[31] >> ) >> >> Or like this: >> >> ( >> ;GM[6]CV[4] >> ;DI[31] >> ) >> >> Or even like this: >> >> ( >> ;GM[6] >> ;DI[31]CV[4] >> ) >> >> The first option is likely to confuse the gnubg SGF parser, and maybe >> mess up the move counting. The other two possibilities will lose some >> unimportant information. What should I do? > > The second choice is similar to what gnubg generates when it plays with > automatic doubles, except that it needs a PL entry before DI or it can't > parse it and fails with :
How can I activate automatic doubles in gnubg? I didn't find an option for that. Otherwise, yes, sure, I will add whatever properties gnubg wants. They were omitted for brevity. Guido -- Империя ООД | Imperia OOD ул. „Княз-Борис-I“ № 86, София 1000 | ul. "Knyaz-Boris-I" № 86, Sofia http://www.imperia.bg/ _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
