Seconded! I was just about to suggest this when I saw Max's post. -- Ian
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Massimiliano Maini Sent: 16 October 2011 18:34 To: Philippe Michel Cc: gnubg-list Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it? doubtful/bad/very bad decisions could be "Flagged" moves, leaving "Marked" for user selected moves. Max. On 14 October 2011 20:34, Philippe Michel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Michael Petch wrote: > >> On 14/10/2011 4:07 AM, Ian Shaw wrote: > >>> 2) Why is "Cmark" called "Cmark" and not simply "Mark"? What >>> information does the "C" convey? > >> I was curious about this naming convention as well. It has confused >> some people in the past. They thought CMARK was to mark cubes. Simply >> going with "Mark" makes sense to me. > > "Mark" is somehow already used for for the doubtful/bad/very bad decisions. > See the red arrows vs. blue arrows in the GUI. > > "CMark" is still not very expressive, of course. > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-gnubg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg > _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
